In Badi-Nazar, political differences have their place, but the readers should tell themselves that all the difficulties created for Tehreek-e-Insaaf so far, were they not illegal? If this is the case, then I think you should fulfill your desire to ban Tehreek-e-Insaf. The first thing is that if this happens, won't Tehreek-e-Insaf come to power tomorrow and ban the PML-N or the PPP? And if this series continues, will it not become a tradition? Let's still try this force, and then the cut that has to come out, it will come out at once. Then what will happen after that? Will Tehreek-e-Insaf end? No, in a few days this move will be challenged and the ban will fly away, the only difference will be that it will waste the time of the courts. And anyway, our courts are sitting with political cases today,,, if this is the case, what will happen to the cases of the common man?
And speaking of the founder of Tehreek-e-Insaf, what difference will it make to him after the ban on Tehreek-e-Insaf? They are already in jail. They will be able to attract more sympathies. But let me say one thing that whatever has to happen now, everything has to be done in front,, and it has to be according to the law,,, either first suspend the law,,, then impose a ban,,, then So it makes sense,,, but doing so while the law is just a waste of time. And if you don't believe it, take it for yourself that all the forceful actions taken against Tehreek-e-Insaaf in two years have gone to the courts and ended, and then the government has to face the election. Also had to be done, the cipher case also blew up, all the bails are being given, so all the cases are ending slowly.
That is, you can stop the constitution, but can it be completely and permanently ignored. So one thing is certain that you can make as many new cases as you want, but these new cases also have to go to the courts and play somewhere on merit. If you are going to ban Tehreek-e-Insaaf in the same way as Faisal Vawda or anyone else says, then the government can take this step, but it will be a challenge. Even when President Ghulam Ishaq Khan dissolved Nawaz Sharif's assembly in 1992, the Supreme Court restored it at that time, that is, you can take any action by force, but it has no importance. And if you couldn't do it 30 years ago, how can it be possible today?
So, it is not possible that if you don't like a party, you can ban it. If the founder of Tehreek-e-Insaaf asked to read the Hamudur Rahman Commission, is it against the constitution? It is just like if you say that the report of the commission on the Model Town incident should not be read at all, then the person asks why you made that report. Then reading the report of the Faizabad sit-in would probably be treason? So if a Supreme Court judge has prepared a report, and this report is stating the facts, what is the problem?
Open your eyes to God and move with the times, because whoever does not move with the times in the world, is left behind. The examples of leaders like Nawaz Sharif and Zardari are in front of you, however, it is not possible to close your eyes and say read such and such thing, then people will do the same, now after the advent of social media, everything It has come in public access, even if you don't want to see something, it has come in front of you. And then if you have in mind that you will impose more restrictions on social media, like you have blocked "X" for a long time,,, then sir! If you ban one app, there are thousands of apps to open it. If it was easy to ban them, UAE, China or Saudi Arabia would have completely controlled it. That means you guessed it WhatsApp calling is banned in the above countries,, but you can call through VPN in those countries and everyone who needs it there is doing it. That is, the more restrictions you impose, the more ways there are to get out of the restrictions.
So government instead of working hard on such useless things, you should work hard on your governance, I still say that if the government controls the inflation, then Imran Khan will end on his own. The way to eliminate the founder of Tehreek-e-Insaaf is not to ban his party, or to ban his speeches on the media, or to ban his name, or to block social media. By doing so, it will gain more sympathies. And then the same mistake was made by the political parties two years ago when the Tehreek-e-Insaf government had passed for three and a half years, but if they were allowed to rule for one and a half more years, the people might have given them power again. I do not bring When you ended his government a year and a half ago, the people thought about it, and then he started getting sympathy and he became more and more popular, which resulted in us being rigged on February 8. fell Therefore, whichever party you forcefully suppress, it will be more popular. You see in America, the more former President Trump is being suppressed, the more his vote bank is getting stronger. From 1977 to 1988, Zia-ul-Haq suppressed the PPP, so did the PPP become weak? Or ended from the end? Then in 2002, Pervez Musharraf banned Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif from participating in politics. Their parties contested the elections but they themselves could not participate in the elections. This has happened to many political parties in the past but it is just a political stunt. But it is a matter of thinking of the political parties that if one party bans the other, then this process is not going to stop anywhere. If Imran Khan has committed a crime, he should be punished, but it should not be such that he or his party's politics is terminated. If it is of prohibited funding, it should be confiscated, fined. Similarly, a whole standard should be made by politicians according to which all politicians should follow.
In any case, the government should not take such measures that will make it more jealous, but the government should play on merit, reduce corruption, let the courts do their work, reduce inflation, reduce the interference of institutions, respect the public mandate, the poor. Think about it, give them relief, stop tax evasion, crack down on corrupt officers in the bureaucracy, strengthen the FBR, stop power theft, strengthen the Election Commission, instead of giving the police an open holiday, make it a street crime and Task to eliminate crimes, stop gangsters from creating a state within a state, stop terrorism, restore law and order, protect foreigners, take measures for tourists, stand up to floods every year. Shut down, eliminate smog increasing every year, take environment friendly measures, crack down on building mafia, property mafia, amalgamation mafia, and other mafias, restore PIA's reputation, bail out railways, Pakistan. Run the steel mill, otherwise give it to someone else so that money does not go out of pocket, bring investment from friendly countries instead of asking for loans, promote domestic industry so that exports increase. Therefore, if the government will give importance to measures to ban its brothers and sisters, then Allah is the protector of this country, this nation and its future generations!
.jpg)
0 Comments